Logo degrowth
Search
Scientific paper

Text

Degrowth: A missile word that backfires?

Authors:
Miklós Antal, Stefan Drews

Entry type:
Scientific paper

Year of publication:
2016

Publishers:
Ecological Economics

Language:
English

External content:
To the content

Keywords: Growth-versus-environment debate; Degrowth; Language; Cognition; Snap judgment; Public understanding

Abstract: Language use and cognition are generally underappreciated topics in ecological economics, even if effective communication is essential for social and political impact. To challenge the economic growth paradigm, the concept and term “degrowth” has recently been embraced by various activists and scholars. Drawing on a body of evidence from cognitive science, psychology, and related fields, we argue that using the word degrowth might be disadvantageous in public communications about alternatives to growth. We begin by reviewing arguments in favor of the term. Then we outline three main counterarguments: First, degrowth has a downward orientation which triggers negative initial feelings due to the basic conceptual metaphor “up is good—down is bad”. This puts advocates of an alternative to the growth paradigm in an unfavorable starting position, given that subsequent thought will be unconsciously biased by the initial feeling. Second, more conscious reactions are likely to be negative as well because people unfamiliar with the term will (mis)interpret it as a contraction of the economy, even though it is not always meant as such. Third, degrowth repeats and possibly strengthens the growth frame and may activate undesirable frames associated with economic recessions. To conclude, we briefly discuss alternative terms and summarize key aspects to be considered for more effective communication.

Ecological Economics, Volume 126, June 2016, Pages 182–187

Share on the corporate technosphere